Constructive Programme - Its Meaning and Place
By Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
First published 1941, revised and enlarged edition in 1945.
FOREWORD
This is a thoroughly revised edition of the Constructive
Programme which I first wrote in 1941. The items included in
it have not been arranged in any order, certainly not in the
order of their importance. When the reader discovers that a
particular subject though important in itself in terms of
Independence does not find place in the programme, he should know
that the omission is not intentional. He should
unhesitatingly add to my list and let me know. My list does
not pretend to be exhaustive; it is merely illustrative. The
reader will see several new and important additions.
Readers, whether workers and volunteers or not, should
definitely realize that the constructive programme is the
truthful and non-violent way of winning Poorna Swaraj. Its
wholesale fulfilment is complete Independence. Imagine all
the forty crores of people busying themselves with the whole
of the constructive programme which is designed to build up
the nation from the very bottom upward. Can anybody
dispute the proposition that it must mean complete
Independence in every sense of the expression, including the
ousting of foreign domination? When the critics laugh at the
proposition, what they mean is that forty crores of people
will never co-operate in the effort to fulfil the programme,
No doubt, there is considerable truth in the scoff. My answer
is, it is still worth the attempt, Given an indomitable will on
the part of a band of earnest workers, the programme is as
workable as any other and more so than most. Anyway, I
have no substitute for it, if it is to be based on non-violence.
Civil Disobedience, mass or individual, is an aid to
constructive effort and is a full substitute for armed revolt,
Training is necessary as well for civil disobedience as for
armed revolt. Only the ways are different. Action in either
4
case takes place only when occasion demands. Training for
military revolt means learning the use of arms ending
perhaps in the atomic bomb. For civil disobedience it means
the Constructive Programme.
Therefore, workers will never be on the look-out for civil
resistance. They will hold themselves in readiness, if the
constructive effort is sought to be defeated. From one or two
illustrations it will be seen where it can be, and where it
cannot be, offered. Political pacts we know have been and
can be, but personal friendship with individuals cannot be,
prevented. Such friendships, selfless and genuine, must be
the basis for political pacts. Similarly, centralized khadi can
be defeated by the Government, but no power can defeat
individual manufacture and use of khadi. The manufacture
and use of khadi must not be imposed upon the people, but it
must be intelligently and willingly accepted by them as one
of the items of the freedom movement. This can be done
only from the villages as units. Pioneers even in such
programmes can be obstructed. They have had to go through
the fire of suffering throughout the world. There is no Swaraj
without suffering. In violence, truth is the first and the
greatest sufferer; in non-violence it is ever triumphant. More-
over, men composing the Government are not to be regard-
ed as enemies. To regard them as such will be contrary to
the non-violent spirit. Part we must, but as friends.
If this preliminary observation has gone home to the
reader, he will find the constructive programme to be full of
deep interest. It should prove as absorbing as politics so-
called and platform oratory, and certainly more important
and useful.
Poona, 13-11-1945
M. K. Gandhi
CONTENTS
FOREWORD................................................ 3
INTRODUCTORY. .......................................... 7
1. COMMUNAL UNITY ...................................... 8
2. REMOVAL OF UNTOUCHABILTY ............................ 10
3. PROHIBITION ......................................... 10
4. KHADI ............................................... 11
5. OTHER VILLAGE INDUSTRIES ...........15
6, VILLAGE SANITATION ..........................15
9. NEW OR BASIC EDUCATION................15
8. ADULT EDUGATION. ............................17
9. WOMEN...................................................18
10. EDUCATION IN HEALTH AND HYGIENE ............... 19
II. PROVINCIAL LANGUAGES................... 20
12. NATIONAL LANGUAGES .................... 21
13. ECONOMIC EQUALITY.. ..................... 22
14. KISANS ................................................. 23
IS. LABOUR .................................................24
16. ADIVASIS. .............................................25
17. LEPERS ..................................................26
18. STUDENTS.... .......................................27
PLACE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE ........29
CONCLUSION ........................................31
APPENDICES: ...............
I. IMPROVEMENT OF CATTLE ................ 32
II CONGRESS POSITION............................ 32
7
INTRODUCTORY
The constructive programme may otherwise and more
fittingly be called construction of Poorna Swaraj or complete
Independence by truthful and non-violent means.
Effort for construction of Independence so called through
violent and, therefore, necessarily untruthful means we know
only too painfully. Look at the daily destruction of property,
life and truth in the present war.
Complete Independence through truth and non-violence
means the independence of every unit, be it the humblest of
the nation, without distinction of race, colour or creed. This
independence is never exclusive. It is, therefore, wholly
compatible with interdependence within or without. Practice
will always fall short of the theory, even as the drawn line
falls short of the theoretical line of Euclid. Therefore,
complete Independence will be complete only to the extent
of our approach in practice to truth and non-violence.
Let the reader mentally plan out the whole of the, con-
structive programme, and he will agree with me that, if it
could be successully worked out, the end of it would be the
Independence we want. Has not Mr. Amery said that an
agreement between the major parties, translated in my
language, any agreement after communal unity which is only
one item in the constructive programme, will be respected?
We need not question his sincerity, for, if such unity is
honestly, i.e., non-violently, attained, it will in itself contain
the power to compel acceptance of the agreed demand,
On the other hand there is no such thing as an imaginary or
even perfect definition of Independence through violence,
For, it presupposes only ascendancy of that party of the
nation which makes the most effective use of violence. In it
perfect equality, economic or otherwise, is inconceivable.
8
But for my purpose, which is to convince the reader of the
necessity of following out the constructive programme in the
non-violent effort, the acceptance of my argument about the
ineffectiveness of violence for the attainment of independ-
ence is not required. The reader is welcome to the belief that
Independence of the humblest unit is possible under a
scheme of violence, if this effort enables him also to admit
that it is a certainty through the complete execution of the
programme by the nation.
Let us now examine the items,
1. COMMUNAL UNITY
Everybody is agreed about the necessity of this unity. But
everybody does not know that unity does not mean political
unity which may be imposed. It means an unbreakable heart
unity. The first thing essential for achieving such unity is for
every Congressman, whatever his religion may be, to re-
present in his own person Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Zoroa-
strian, Jew, etc., shortly, every Hindu and non-Hindu. He has
to feel his identity with every one of the millions of the
inhabitants of Hindustan. In order to realize this, every
Congressman will cultivate personal friendship with persons
representing faiths other than his own. He should have the
same regard for the other faiths as he has for his own.
In such a happy state of things there would be no disgrace-
ful cry at the stations such as "Hindu water" and "Muslim
water" or "Hindu tea" and "Musrim tea". There would be no
separate rooms or pots for Hindus and non-Hindus in schools
and colleges, no communal schools, colleges and hospitals.
The beginning of such a revolution has to be made by
Congressmen without any political motive behind the
correct conduct. Political unity will be its natural fruit.
We have long been accustomed to think that power comes
only through Legislative Assemblies. I have regarded this
belief as a grave error brought about by inertia or hypnotism.
9
A superficial study of British history has made us think that
all power percolates to the people from parliaments. The
truth is that power resides in the people and it is entrusted for
the time being to those whom they may choose as their
representatives. Parliaments have no power or even
existence independently of the people. It has been my effort
for the last twenty-one years to convince the people of this
simple truth. Civil Disobedience is the storehouse of power.
Imagine a whole people unwilling to conform to the laws of
the legislature, and prepared to suffer the consequences of
non-compliance! They will bring the whole legislative and
executive machinery to a standstill. The police and the
military are of use to coerce minorities however powerful
they may be. But no police or military coercion can bend the
resolute will of a people who are out for suffering to the
uttermost,
And Parliamentary procedure is good only when its
members are willing to conform to the will of the majority. In
other words, it is fairly effective only among compatibles.
Here in India we have been pretending to work the
parliamentary system under separate electorates which have
created artificial incompatibles. Living unity can never come
out of these artificial entities being brought together on a
common platform. Such legislatures may function. But they
can only be a platform for wrangling and sharing the crumbs
of power that may fall from rulers whoever they may be.
These rule with a rod of iron, and prevent the opposing
elements from flying at one another's throats. I hold the
emergence of complete Independence to be an impossibility
out of such a disgrace.
Though I hold such strong views, I have come to the
conclusion that so long as there are undesirable candidates
for elective bodies, Congress should put up candidates in
order to prevent reactionaries from entering such bodies.
10
2. REMOVAL OF UNTOUCHABILITY
At this time of the day it is unnecessary to dilate upon the
necessity of the removal of this blot and curse upon
Hinduism. Congressmen have certainly done much in this
matter. But I am sorry to have to say that many Congressmen
have looked upon this item as a mere political necessity and
not something indispensable, so far as Hindus are concerned,
for the very existence of Hinduism. If Hindu Congressmen
take up the cause for its own sake, they will influence the so-
called *Sanatanis* far more extensively than they have hitherto
done. They should approach them not in a militant spirit but,
as befits their non-violence, in a spirit of friendliness. And so
far as the Harijans are concerned, every Hindu should make
common cause with them and befriend them in their awful
isolation-- such isolation as perhaps the world has never seen
in the monstrous immensity one witnesses in India. I know
from experience how difficult the task is. But it is part of the
task of building the edifice of Swaraj. And the road to Swaraj
is steep and narrow. There are many slippery ascents and
many deep chasms. They have all to be negotiated with
unfaltering step before we can reach the summit and breathe
the fresh air of freedom.
3. PROHIBITION
Although like communal unity and removal of untouch-
ability prohibition has been on the Congress programme
since 1920, Congressmen have not taken the interest they
might have taken in this very vital social and moral reform. If
we are to reach our goal through non-violent effort, we may
not leave to the future government the fate of lakhs of men
and women who are labouring under the curse of intoxicants
and narcotics.
Medical men can make a most effective contribution
towards the removal of this evil. They have to discover ways
11
of weaning the drunkard and the opium-addict from the
curse .
Women and students have a special opportunity in advanc-
ing this reform. By many acts of loving service they can
acquire on addicts a hold which will compel them to listen to
the appeal to give up the evil habit.
Congress committees can open recreation booths where
the tired labourer will rest his limbs, get healthy and cheap
refreshments, and find suitable games, All this work is
fascinating and uplifting. The non-violent approach to
Swaraj is a novel approach. In it old values give place to new.
In the violent way such reforms may find no place. Believers
in that way, in their impatience and, shall I say, ignorance,
put off such things to the day of deliverance. They forget that
lasting and healthy deliverance comes from within, i.e. from
self-purification. Constructive workers make legal prohibi-
tion easy and successful even if they do not pave the way for
4. KHADI
*Khadi* is a controversial subject. Many people think that in
advocating *Khadi* I am sailing against a headwind and am
sure to sink the ship of Swaraj and that I am taking the
country to the dark ages. I do not propose to argue the case
for *Khadi* in this brief survey. I have argued it sufficiently
elsewhere. Here I want to show what every Congressman,
and for that matter every Indian, can do to advance the
cause of *Khadi*. It connotes the beginning of economic
freedom and equality of all in the country. "The proof of the
pudding is in the eating." Let everyone try, and he or she will
find out for himself or herself the truth of what I am saying.
*Khadi* must be taken with all its implications. It means a
wholesale Swadeshi mentality, a determination to find all the
necessaries of life in india and that too through the labour
andintellect of the villagers. That means a reversal 6f the
12
existing process. That is to say that, instead of half a dozen
cities of India and Great Britain living on the exploitation
and the ruin of the 7,00,000 villages of India, the latter will be
largely self-contained, and will voluntarily serve the cities of
India and even the outside world in so far as it benefits both
the parties.
This needs a revolutionary change in the mentality and
tastes of many. Easy though the non-violent way is in many
respects, it is very difficult in many others. It vitally touches
the life of every single Indian, makes him feel aglow with the
possession of a power that has lain hidden within himself,
and makes him proud of his identity with every drop of the
ocean of Indian humanity. This non-violence is not the
inanity for which we have mistaken it through all these long
ages; it is the most potent force as yet known to mankind and
on which its very existence is dependent. It is that force
which I have tried to present to the Congress and through it
to the world. *Khadi* to me is the symbol of unity of Indian
humanity, of its economic freedom and equality and, there-
fore, ultimately, in the poetic expression of Jawaharlal
Nehru, "the livery of India's freedom".
Moreover, *Khadi* mentality means decentralization of the
production and distribution of the necessaries of life. There-
fore, the formula so far evolved is, every village to produce
all its necessaries and a certain percentage in addition for the
requirements of the cities.
Heavy industries will needs be centralized and nationaliz-
ed. But they will occupy the least part of the vast national
activity which will mainly be in the villages,
Having explained the implications of *Khadi*, I must
indicate what Congressmen can and should do towards its
promotion. Production of *Khadi* includes cotton growing,
picking, ginning, cleaning, carding, slivering, spinning, sizing,
dyeing, preparing the warp and the woof, weaving, and wash-
ing. These, with the exception of dyeing, are essential
processes. Every one of them can be effectively handled in
the villages and is being so handled in many villages through-
13
out India which the A.I.S.A, is covering. According to the
latest report the following are the interesting figures:
2,75,146 villagers, including 19,645 Harijans and 57,378
Muslims, scattered in at least 13,451 villages received, as
spinners, weavers, etc. Rs. 34,85,609 in 1940. The spinners
were largely women.
Yet the work done is only one-hundredth part of what
could be done if Congressmen honestly took up the *Khadi*
programme. Since the wanton destruction of this central
village industry and the allied handicrafts, intelligence and
brightness have fled from the villages, leaving them inane,
lustreless, and reduced almost to the state of their ill-kept
cattle.
If Congressmen will be true to their Congress call in
respect of *Khadi* they will carry out the instructions of the
A. I.S.A. issued from time to time as to the part they can play
in Khadi planning. Only a few broad rules can be laid down
here:
1. Every family with a plot of ground can grow cotton at
least for family use. Cotton growing is an easy process. In
Bihar the cultivators were by law compelled to grow indigo
on 3/20 of their cultivable land. This was in the interest of the
foreign indigo planter. Why cannot we grow cotton
voluntarily for the nation on a certain portion of our land?
The reader will note that decentralization commences from
the beginning of the *Khadi* processes. Today cotton crop is
centralized and has to be sent to distant parts of India.
Before the war it used to be sent principally to Britain and
Japan. It was and still is a money crop and, therefore, subject
to the fluctuations of the market. Under the Khadi scheme
cotton growing becomes free from this uncertainty and
gamble. The grower grows what he needs. The farmer needs
to know that his first business is to grow for his own needs.
When he does that, he will reduce the chance of a low
market ruining him.
2. Every spinner would buy--if he has not his own--
enough cotton for ginning, which he can easily do without
14
the hand-ginning roller frame. He can gin his own portion
with a board and an iron rolling pin. Where this is considered
impracticable, hand-ginned cotton should be bought and
carded. Carding for self can be done well on a tiny bow
without much effort. The greater the decentralization of
labour, the simpler and cheaper the tools. The slivers made,
the process of spinning commences. I strongly recommend
the *dhanush takli*. I have used it frequently. My speed on it is
almost the same as on the wheel. I draw a finer thread and
the strength and evenness of the yarn are greater on the
*dhanush takli* than on the wheel. This may not, however,
hold good for all. My emphasis on the *dhanush takli* is based
on the fact that it is more easily made, is cheaper than and
does not require frequent repairs like the wheel. Unless one
knows how to make the two mals and to adjust them when
they slip or to put the wheel right when it refuses to work, the
wheel has often to lie idle. Moreover, if the millions take to
spinning at once, as they well may have to, the *dhanush takli*
being the instrument most easily made and handled, is the
only tool that can meet the demand. It is more easily made
even than the simple *takli*. The best, easiest and cheapest
way is to make it oneself. Indeed one ought to learn how to
handle and make simple tools. Imagine the unifying and
educative effect of the whole nation simultaneously taking
part in the process up to spinning! Consider the levelling
effect of the bond of common labour between the rich and
the goer!
Yarn thus produced may be used in three ways: by
presenting it to the A.I.S.A. for the sake of the poor, by
having it woven for personal use, or by getting as much
*Khadi* for it as it can buy. It is clear enough that the finer and
better the yarn the greater will be its virtue. If Congressmen
will put their heart into the work, thej will make improve-
ments in the tools and make many discoveries. In our
country there has been a divorce between labour and
intelligence, The result has been stagnation. If there is an
indissoluble marriage between the two, and that in the
15
manner here suggested, the resultant good will be
inestimable.
In this scheme of nation-wide spinning as a sacrifice, I do
not expect the average man or woman to give more than one
hour daily to this work.
5. OTHER VILLAGE INDUSTRIES
These stand on a different footing from *Khadi*. There is
not much scope for voluntary labour in them. Each industry
will take the labour of only a certain number of hands. These
industries come in as a handmaid to *Khadi*. They cannot
exist without *Khadi*, and *Khadi* will be robbed of its dignity
without them. Village economy cannot be complete without
the essential village industries such as hand-grinding, hand-
pounding, soap-making, paper-making, match-making,
tanning, oil-pressing, etc. Congressmen can interest them-
selves in these and, if they are villagers or will settle down in
villages, they will give these industries a new life and a new
dress. All should make it a point of honour to use only village
articles whenever and wherever available. Given the demand
there is no doubt that most of our wants can be supplied from
our villages. When we have become village-minded, we will
not want imitations of the West or machine-made products,
but we will develop a true national taste in keeping with the
vision of a new India in which pauperism, starvation and
idleness will be unknown.
6. VILLAGE SANITATION
Divorce between intelligence and labour has resulted in
criminal negligence of the villages. And so, instead of having
graceful hamlets dotting the land, we have dung-heaps. The
approach to many villages is not a refreshing experience.
Often one would like to shut one's eyes and stuff one's nose;
16
such is the surrounding dirt and offending smell. If the
majority of Congressmen were derived from our villages, as
they should be, they should be able to make our villages
models of cleanliness in every sense of the word. But they
have never considered it their duty to identify themselves
with the villagers in their daily lives. A sense of national or
social sanitation is not a virtue among us. We may take a
kind of a bath, but we do not mind dirtying the well or the
tank or the river by whose side or in which we perform
ablutions. 1 regard this defect as a great vice which is res-
ponsible for the disgraceful state of our villages and the
sacred banks of the sacred rivers and for the diseases that
spring from insanitation.
7. NEW OR BASIC EDUCATION
This is a new subject. But the members of the Working
Committee felt so much interested in it that they gave a
charter to the organizers of the Hindustani Talimi Sangh
which has been functioning since the Haripura session. This
is a big field of work for many Congressmen. This education
is meant to transform village children into model villagers. It
is principally designed for them. The inspiration for it has
come from the villages. Congressmen who want to build up
the structure of Swaraj from its very foundation dare not
neglect the children. Foreign rule has unconsciously, though
none the less surely, begun with the children in the field of
education. Primary education is a farce designed without
regard to the wants of the India of the villages and for that
matter even of the cities. Basic education links the children,
whether of the cities or the villages, to all that is best and
lasting in India. It develops both the body and the mind, and
keeps the child rooted to the soil with a glorious vision of the
future in the realization of which he or she begins to take his
or her share from the very commencement of his or her
career in school, Congressmen would find it of absorbing
interest benefiting themselves equally with the children with
17
whom they come in contact. Let those who wish, put them-
selves in touch with the Secretary of the Sangh at Sevagram.
8. ADULT EDUCATION
This has been woefully neglected by Congressmen. Where
they have not neglected it, they have been satisfied with teach-
ing illiterates to read and write. If I had charge of adult
education, I should begin with opening the minds of the adult
pupils to the greatness and vastness of their country. The
villager's India is contained in his village. If he goes to
another village, he talks of his own village as his home.
Hindustan is for him a geographical term. We have no notion
of the ignorance prevailing in the villages. The villagers
know nothing of foreign rule and its evils. What little know-
ledge they have picked up fills them with the awe the
foreigner inspires. The result is the dread and hatred of the
foreigner and his rule. They do not know how to get rid of it.
They do not know that the foreigner's presence is due to
their own weaknesses and their ignorance of the power they
possess to rid themselves of the foreign rule. My adult educa-
tion means, therefore, first, true political education of the
adult by word of mouth, Seeing that this will be mapped out,
it can be given without fear. I imagine that it is too late in the
day for authority to interfere with this type of education; but
if there is interference, there must be a fight for this ele-
mentary right without which there can be no Swaraj. Of
course, in all I have written, openness has been assumed,
Non-violence abhors fear and, therefore, secrecy. Side by
side with the education by the mouth will be the literary
education. This is itself a speciality. Many methods are being
tried in order to shorten the period of education, A
temporary or permanent board of experts may be appointed
by the Working Committee to give shape to the idea here
adumbrated and guide the workers. I admit that what I have
said in this paragraph only points the way but does not tell
18
the average Congressman how to go about it. Nor is every
Congressman fitted for this highly special work. But
Congressmen who are teachers should find no difficulty in
laying down a course in keeping with the suggestions made
herein.
9. WOMEN
I have included service of women in the constructive
programme, for though satyagraha has automatically
brought India's women out from their darkness, as nothing
else could have in such an incredibly short space of time,
Congressmen have not felt the call to see that women
became equal partners in the fight for Swaraj. They have not
realized that woman must be the true helpmate of man in the
mission of service. Woman has been suppressed under
custom and law for which man was responsible and in the
shaping of which she had no hand. In a plan of life based on
non-violence, woman has as much right to shape her own
destiny as man has to shape his. But as every right in a non-
violent society proceeds from the previous performance of a
duty, it follows that rules of social conduct must be framed
by mutual co-operation and consultation. They can never be
imposed from outside. Men have not realized this truth in its
fulness in their behaviour towards women. They have
considered themselves to be lords and masters of women
instead of considering them as their friends and co-workers.
It is the privilege of Congressmen to give the women of India
a lifting hand. Women are in the position somewhat of the
slave of old who did not know that he could or ever had to be
free. And when freedom came, for the moment he felt help-
less. Women have been taught to regard themselves as slaves
of men. It is up to Congressmen to see that they enable them
to realize their full status and play their part as equals of men,
This revolution is easy, if the mind is made up. Let
Congressmen begin with their own homes. Wives should not
be dolls and objects of indulgence, but should be treated as
19
honoured comrades in common service. To this end those
who have not received a liberal education should receive
such instruction as is possible from their husbands. The same
observation applies, with the necessary changes, to mothers
and daughters.
It is hardly necessary to point out that I have given a one-
sided picture of the helpless state of India's women. I am
quite conscious of the fact that in the villages generally' they
hold their own with their men folk and in some respects even
rule them. But to the impartial outsider the legal and
customary status of woman is bad enough throughout and
demands radical alteration.
10. EDUCATION IN HEAL.TH AND HYGIENE
Having given a place to village sanitation, the question
may be asked why give a separate place to education in
health and hygiene? It might have been bracketed with
sanitation, but I did not wish to interfere with the items.
Mention of mere sanitation is not enough to include health
and hygiene. The art of keeping one's health and the know-
ledge of hygiene is by itself a separate subject of study and
corresponding practice. In a well-ordered society the citizens
know and observe the laws of health and hygiene. It is
established beyond doubt that ignorance and neglect of the
laws of health and hygiene are responsible for the majority
of diseases to which mankind is heir. The very high death
rate among us is no doubt due largely to our gnawing
poverty, but it could be mitigated if the people were properly
educated about health and hygiene.
*Mens sana in corpore sane* is perhaps the first law for
humanity. A healthy mind in a healthy body is a self-evident
truth. There is an inevitable connection between mind and
body. If we were in possession of healthy minds, we would
shed all violence and, naturally obeying the laws of health, we
would have healthy bodies without an effort. I hope, there-
20
fore, that no Congressmen will disregard this item of the
constructive programme. The fundamental laws of health
and hygiene are simple and easily learnt. The difficulty is
about their observance. Here are some:
Think the purest thoughts and banish all idle and impure
thoughts.
Breathe the freshest air day and night.
Establish a balance between bodily and mental work.
Stand erect, sit erect, and be neat and clean in every one of
your acts, and let these be an expression of your inner
condition.
Eat to live for service of fellow-men. Do not ~ive for
indulging yourselves. Hence your food must be just enough
to keep your mind and body in good order. Man becomes
what he eats.
Your water, food and air must be clean, and you will not be
satisfied with mere personal cleanliness, but you will infect
your surroundings with the same threefold cleanliness that
you will desire for yourselves.
11. PROVINCIAL LANGUAGES
Our love of the English language in preference to our own
mother tongue has caused a deep chasm between the educat-
ed and politically-minded classes and the masses. The
languages of India have suffered impoverishment. We
flounder when we make the vain attempt to express abstruse
thought in the mother tongue. There are no equivalents for
scientific terms. The result has been disastrous. The masses
remain cut off from the modern mind. We are too near our
own times correctly to measure the disservice caused to
India by this neglect of its great languages; It is easy enough
to understand that, unless we undo the mischief, the mass
mind must remain imprisoned. The masses can make no
solid contribution to the construction of Swaraj. It is in-
herent in Swaraj based on non-violence that every individual
21
makes his own direct contribution to the Independence
movement. The masses cannot do this fully unless they
understand every step with all its implications. This is im-
possible unless every step is explained in their own
languages.
12. NATIONAL LANGUAGE
And then for all-India intercourse we need, from among
the Indian stock, a language which the largest number of
people already know and understand and which the others
can easily pick up. This language is indisputably Hindi. It is
spoken and understood by both Hindus and Muslims of the
North. It is called Urdu when it is written in the Urdu
character. The Congress, in its famous resolution passed at
the Cawnpore session in 1925, called this all-India speech
Hindustani. And since that time, in theory at least, Hindu-
stani has been the Rashtra Bhasha. I say 'in theory' because
even Congressmen have not practised it as they should have.
In 1920 a deliberate attempt was begun to recognize the
importance of Indian languages for the political education of
the masses, as also of an all-India common speech which
politically-minded India could easily speak and which
Congressmen from the different provinces could understand
at all-India gatherings of the Congress. Such National
languages should enable one to understand and speak both
forms of speech and write in both the scripts.
I am sorry to have to say that many Congressmen have
failed to carry out that resolution. And so we have, in my
opinion, the shameful spectacle of Congressmen insisting on
speaking in English and compelling others to do likewise for
their sakes. The spell that English has cast on us is not yet
broken. Being under it, we are impeding the progress of
India towards her goal. Our love of the masses must be skin-
deep, if we will not take the trouble of spending over learning
Hindustani as many months as the years we spend over
learning English.
22
13. ECONOMIC EQUALITY
This last is the master key to non-violent Independence.
Working for economic equality means abolishing the eternal
conflict between capital and labour. It means the levelling
down of the few rich in whose hands is concentrated the bulk
of the nation's wealth on the one hand, and the levelling up
of the semi-starved naked millions on the other. A non-
violent system of Government is clearly an impossibility so
long as the wide gulf between the rich and the hungry
millions persists. The contrast between the palaces of New
Delhi and the miserable hovels of the poor labouring class
nearby cannot last one day in a free India in which the poor
will enjoy the same power as the richest in the land. A violent,
and bloody revolution is a certainty one day unless there is a
voluntary abdication of riches and the power that riches give
and sharing them for the common good.
I adhere to my doctrine of trusteeship in spite of the
ridicule that has been poured upon it. It is true that it is
difficult to reach. So is non-violence. But we made up our
minds in 1920 to negotiate that steep ascent. We have found
it worth the effort. It involves a daily growing appreciation of
the working of non-violence. It is expected that Congress-
men will make a diligent search and reason out for them-
selves the why and the wherefore of non-violence. They
should ask themselves how the existing inequalities can be
abolished violently or non-violently. I think we know the
violent way. It has not succeeded anywhere.
This non-violent experiment is still in the making. We have
nothing much yet to show by way of demonstration. It is
certain, however, that the method has begun to work though
ever so slowly in the direction of equality. And since non-
violence is a process of conversion, the conversion, if
achieved, must be permanent. a society or a nation con-
structed non-violently must be able to withstand attack upon
its structure from without or within. We have moneyed
23
Congressmen in the organization. They have to lead the way.
This fight provides an opportunity for the closest heart-
searching on the part of every individual Congressman. If
ever we are to achieve equality, the foundation has to be laid
now, Those who think that the major reforms will come after
the advent of Swaraj are deceiving themselves as to the
elementary working of non-violent Swaraj. It will not drop
from heaven all of a sudden one fine morning, But it has to
be built up brick by brick by corporate self-effort, We have
travelled a fair way in that direction, But a much longer and
weary distance has to be covered before we can behold
Swaraj in its glorious majesty, Every Congressman has to ask
himself what he has done towards the attainment of
economic equality,
14. KISANS
The programme is not exhaustive. Swaraj is a mighty
structure. Eighty crores of hands have to work at building it,
Of these *kisans*, i.e., the peasantry are the largest part. In
fact, being the bulk of them (probably over 80%) the *kisans*
should be the Congress, But they are not, When they become
conscious of their non-violent strength, no power on earth
can resist them.
They must not be used for power politics. I consider it to
be contrary to the non-violent method. Those who would
know my method of organizing *kisans* may profitably study
the movement in Champaran when *satyagraha* was tried for
the first time in India with the result all India knows. It
became a mass movement which remained wholly non-
violent from start to finish. It affected over twenty lakhs of
*kisans*. The struggle centred round one specific grievance
which was a century old. There had been several violent
revolts to get rid of the grievance. The *kisans* were suppres-
sed, The non-violent remedy succeeded in full in six months.
The *kisans* of Champaran became politically conscious with-
out any direct effort. The tangible proof they had of the
24
working of non-violence to remove their grievance drew
them to the Congress, and led by Babu Brijkishoreprasad and
Babu Rajendraprasad they gave a good account of them-
selves during the past Civil Disobedience campaigns.
The reader may also priofitably study the kisan movements
in Kheda, Bardoli and Borsad, The secret of success lies in a
refusal to exploit the *kisans* for political purpose outside
their own personal and felt grievances. Organization round a
specific wrong they understand. They need no sermons on
non-violence. Let them learn to apply non-violence as an
effective remedy which they can understand, and later when
they are told that the method they were applying was non-
violent, they readily recognize it as such.
From these illustrations Congressmen who care could
study how work can be done for and among *kisans*. I hold
that the method that some Congressmen have followed to
organize *kisans* has done them no good and has probably
harmed them. Anyway they have not used the non-violent
method. Be it said to the credit of some of these workers that
they frankly admit that they do not believe in the non-violent
method. My advice to such workers would be that they
should neither use the Congress name nor work as Congress-
men.
The reader will now understand why I have refrained from
the competition to organize *kisans* and Labour on an all-
India basis. How I wish that all hands pulled in the same
direction! But perhaps in a huge country like ours it is
impossible. Anyway, in non-violence there is no coercion.
Cold reason and demonstration of the working of non-
violence must be trusted to do the work.
In my opinion, like labour, they should have under the
Congress, a department working for their specific question.
15. LABOUR
Ahmedabad Labour Union is a model for all India to copy,
Its basis is non-violence, pure and simple, It has never had a
25
set-back in its career. It has gone on from strength to
strength without fuss and without show. It has its hospital, its
schools for the children of the mill-hands, its Glasses for
adults, its own printing press and *khadi* depot, and its own
residential quarters. Almost all the hands are voters and
decide the fate of elections. They came on the voters' list at
the instance of the Provincial Congress Committee. The
organization has never taken part in party politics of the
Congress. It influences the municipal policy of the city. It has
to its credit very successful strikes which were wholly non-
violent. Mill-owners and labour have governed their relations
largely through voluntary arbitration. If I had my way, I
would regulate all the labour organizations of India after the
Ahmedabad model. It has never sought to intrude itself upon
the All-India Trade Union Congress and has been unin-
fluenced by that Congress. A time, I hope, will come when it
will be possible for the Trade Union Congress to accept the
Ahmedabad method and have the Ahmedabad organization
as part of the All-India Union. But I am in no hurry. It will
come in its own time.
16. ADIVASIS
The term *adivasi*, like *raniparaj*, is a coined word. *Rani-
paraj* stands for *kaliparaj* (meaning black people, though
their skin is no more black than that of any other). It was
coined, I think by Shri Jugatram. The term *adivasi* (for Bhils,
Gonds, or others variously described as Hill Tribes or ab-
originals) means literally original inhabitants and was coined,
I believe, by Thakkar Bapa,
Service of *adivasis* is also a part of the constructive
programme. Though they are the sixteenth number in this
programme, they are not the least in point of importance.
Our country is so vast and the races so varied that the best of
us cannot know all there is to know of men and their condi-
tion. As one discovers this for oneself, one realizes how diffi-
cult it is to make good our claim to be one nation, unless every
26
unit has a living consciousness of being one with every other.
The *adivasis* are over two crores in all India. Bapa began
work among the Bhils years ago in Gujarat. In about 1940
Shri Balasaheb Kher threw himself with his usual zeal into
this much-needed service in the Thana District. He is now
President of the Adivasi Seva Mandal.
There are several such other workers in other pacts of
India and yet they are too few. Truly, "the harvest is rich but
the labourers are few." Who can deny that all such service is
not merely humanitarian but solidly national, and brings us
nearer to true independence?
17. LEPERS
Leper is a word of bad odour. India is perhaps a home of
lepers next only to Central Africa. Yet they are as much a
part of society as the tallest among us. But the tall absorb our
attention though they are least in need of it. The lot of the
lepers who are much in need of attention is studied neglect. I
am tempted to call it heartless, which it certainly is, in terms
of non-violence. It is largely the missionary who, be it said to
his credit, bestows care on him. The only institution run by an
Indian, as a pure labour of love, is by Shri Manohar Diwan
near Wardha. It is working under the inspiration and
guidance of Shri Vinoba Bhave. If India was pulsating with
new life, if we were all in earnest about winning independ-
ence in the quickest manner possible by truthful and non-
violent means, there would not be a leper or beggar in India
uncared for and unaccounted for. In this revised edition I am
deliberately introducing the leper as a link in the chain of
constructive effort. For, what the leper is in India, that we
are, if we will, but look about us, for the modern civilized
world. Examine the condition of our brethren across the
ocean and the truth of my remark will be borne home to us.
27
18. STUDENTS
I have reserved students to the last. I have always culti-
vated close contact with them. They know me and I know
them. They have given me service. Many ex-collegians are
my esteemed co-workers. I know that they are the hope of
the future. In the heyday of non-co-operation they were
invited to leave their schools and colleges. Some professors
and students who responded to the Congress call have
remained steadfast and gained much for the country and
themselves, The call has not been repeated for there is not
the atmosphere for it. But experience has shown that the lure
of the current education, though it is false and unnatural, is
too much for the youth of the country. College education
provides a career. It is a passport for entrance to the charm-
ed circle. Pardonable hunger for knowledge cannot be satis-
fied otherwise than by going through the usual rut. They do
not mind the waste of precious years in acquiring knowledge
of an utterly foreign language which takes the place of the
mother tongue, The sin of it is never felt. They and their
teachers have made up their minds that the indigenous
languages are useless for gaining access to modern thought
and the modern sciences, I wonder how the Japanese are
faring. For, their education, I understand, is all given in
Japanese. The Chinese Generalissimo knows very little, if
anything, of English.
But such as the students are, it is from these young men
and women that the future leaders of the nation are to rise.
Unfortunately they are acted upon by every variety of influ-
ences. Non-violence offers them little attraction. A blow for a
blow or two for one is an easily understandable proposition.
It seems to yield immediate result though momentary. It is a
never-ending trial of brute strength as we see in time of war
among brutes or among human beings. Appreciation of non-
violence means patient research and still more patient and
difficult practice. I have not entered the list of competitors
for the students' hand, for the reasons that have dictated my
28
course about *kisans* and Labour. But I am myself a fellow
student, using the word in its broader sense. My university is
diflerent from theirs. They have a standing invitation from
me to come to my university and join me in my search. Here
are the terms:
1. Students must not take part in party politics. They are
students, searchers, not politicians.
2. They may not resort to political strikes. They must have
their heroes, but their devotion to them is to be shown by
copying the best in their heroes, not by going on strikes, if
the heroes are imprisoned or die or are even sent to the
gallows. if their grief is unbearable and if all the students feel
equally, schools or colleges may be closed on such occasions,
with the consent of their principals. If the principals will not
listen, it is open to the students to leave their institutions in a
becoming manner till the managers repent and recall them
On no account may they use coercion against dissentients or
against the authorities. They must have the confidence that
if they are united and dignified in their conduct, they are sure
to win.
3. They must all do sacrificial spinning in a scientific
manner. Their tools shall be always neat, clean, and in good
order and condition. If possible, they will learn to make them
themselves. Their yarn will naturally be of the highest
quality. They will study the literature about spinning with a
its economic, social, moral and political implications.
4. They will be *khadi*-users all through and use village
products to the exclusion of all analogous things, foreign or
machine-made.
5. They may not impose *Vande Mataram* or the National
Flag on others. They may wear National flag buttons on
their own persons but not force others to do the same.
6. They can enforce the message of the tricolour flag
their own persons and harbour neither communalism nor
untouchability in their hearts. They will cultivate real friend-
ship with students of other faiths and with Harijans as if they
were their own kith and kin.
29
7. They will make it a point to give first aid to their injured
neighbours and do scavenging and cleaning in the neighbour-
ing villages and instruct village children and adults.
8. They will learn the national language, Hindustani, in its
present double dress, two forms of speech and two scripts,
that they may feel at home whether Hindi or Urdu is spoken
and nagari or urdu script is written.
9. They will translate into their own mother tongue every-
thing new they may learn, and transmit it in their weekly
rounds to the surrounding villages.
19. They will do nothing in secret, they will be above board
in all their dealings, they will lead a pure life of self-restraint
shed all fear and be always ready to protect their weak
fellow-students, and be ready to quell riots by non-violent
conduct at the risk of their lives. And when the final heat of
the struggle comes they will leave their institutions and, if
need be, sacrifice themselves for the freedom of their
country.
11. They will be scrupulously correct and chivalrous in
their behaviour towards their girl fellow-students,
For working out the programme I have sketched for them,
the students must find time. I know that they waste a great
deal of time in idleness. By strict economy, they can save
many hours. But I do not want to put an undue strain upon
any student. I would, therefore, advise patriotic students to
lose one year, not at a stretch but spread it over their whole
study. They will find that one year so given will not be a
waste of time. The effort will add to their equipment, mental,
moral and physical, and they will have made even during
their studies a substantial contribution to the freedom
movement.
PLACE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
I have said in these pages that Civil Disobedience is not
absolutely necessary to win freedom through purely non-
30
violent effort, if the co-operation of the whole nation is
secured in the constructive programme, But such good luck
rarely favours nations or individuals. Therefore; it is
necessary to know the place of Civil Disobedience in a
nation-wide non-violent effort.
It has three definite functions:
1. It can be effectively offered for the redress of a local
wrong.
2. It can be offered without regard to effect, though aimed
at a particular wrong or evil, by way of self-immolation in
order to rouse local consciousness or conscience. Such was
the case in Champaran when I offered Civil Disobedience
without any regard to the effect and well knowing that even
the people might remain apathetic. That it proved otherwise
may be taken, according to taste, as God's grace or a stroke
of good luck,
3. In the place of full response to constructive effort, it can
be offered as it was in 1941. Though it was a contribution to
and part of the battle for freedom, it was purposely centred
round a particular issue, i.e. free speech. Civil Disobedience
can never be directed fur a general cause such as for
Independence. The issue must be definite and capable of
being clearly understood and within the power of the
opponent to yield. This method properly applied must lead
to the final goal.
I have not examined here the full scope and possibilities of
Civil Disobedience. I have touched enough of it to enable the
reader to understand the connection between the con-
structive programme and Civil Disobedience. In the first two
cases, no elaborate constructive programme was or could be
necessary. But when Civil Disobedience is itself devised for
the attainment of Independence, previous preparation is
necessary, and it has to be backed by the visible and con-
scious effort of those who are engaged in the battle. Civil
Disobedience is thus a stimulation for the fighters and a
challenge to the opponent. It should be clear to the reader
that Civil Disobedience in terms of Independence without
31
the co-operation of the millions by way of constructive effort
is mere bravado and worse than useless.
CONCLUSION
This is not a thesis written on behalf of the Congress or at
the instance of the Central Office. It is the outcome of
conversations I had with some co-workers in Sevagram,
They had felt the want of something from my pen showing
the connection between the constructive programme and
Civil Disobedience and how the former might be worked, I
have endeavoured to supply the want in this pamphlet. It
does not purport to be exhaustive, but it is sufficiently indi-
cative of the way the programme should be worked.
Let not the reader make the mistake of laughing at any of
the items as being part of the movement for Independence.
Many people do many things, big and small, without connect-
ing them with non-violence or Independence, They have then
their limited value as expected, The same man appearing as a
civilian may be of no consequence, but appearing in his
capacity as General he is a big personage, holding the lives of
millions at his mercy. Similarly. the charkha in the hands of a
poor widow brings a paltry pice to her, in the hands of a
Jawaharlal it is an instrument of India's freedom. It is the
office which gives the charkha its dignity. It is the office
assigned to the constructive programme which gives it an
irresistible prestige and power,
Such at least is my view. It may be that of a mad man, If it
makes no appeal to the Congressman. I must be rejected. For
my handling of Civil Disobedience without the constructive
programme will be like a paralyzed hand attempting to lift a
spoon,
Poona, 13-11-1943
32
APPENDICES
I
IMPROVEMENT OF CATTLE
(This is what Gandhiji wrote sometime ago about adding
Goseva as one more item in the Constructive Programme.
J, Desai)
Extract from a letter written by Gandhiji to Shri Jivanji
Desai:
Sodepur,
16-1-'46
"...You are right: cow service (goseva) should be
included as one more item in the Constructive Programme. I
would phrase it as improvement of cattle. I think it should not
have been left out. We shall see about it when the next
edition is out."
II
CONGRESS POSITION
Indian National Congress which is the oldest national
political organization and which has after many battles
fought her non-violent way to freedom cannot be allowed to
die. It can only die with the nation. A living organism ever
grows or it dies, The Congress has won political freedom, but
it has yet to win economic freedom, social and moral
freedom. These freedoms are harder than the political, if
only because they are constructive, less exciting and not
spectacular. All-embracing constructive work evokes the
energy of all the units of the millions,
The Congress has got the preliminary and necessary part
of her freedom. The hardest has yet to come. In its difficult
ascent to democracy, it has inevitably created rotten
boroughs leading to corruption and creation of institutions,
popular and democratic only in name. How to get out of the
weedy and unwieldy growth?
33
The Congress must do away with its special register of
members, at no time exceeding one crore, not even then
easily identifiable. It has an unknown register of millions who
could never be wanted. Its register should now be co-
extensive with all the men and women on the voters' rolls in
the country. The Congress business should be to see that no
faked name gets in and no legitimate name is left out. On its
own register it will have a body of servants of the nation who
would be workers doing the work allotted to them from time
to time.
Unfortunately for the country they will be drawn chiefly
for the time being from the city dwellers, most of whom
would be required to work for and in the villages of India.
The ranks must be filled in increasing numbers from
villagers.
These servants will be expected to operate upon and serve
the voters registered according to law, in their own surround-
ings. Many persons and parties will woo them. The very best
will win. Thus and in no other way can the Congress regain
its fast ebbing unique position in the country. But yesterday
the Congress was unwittingly the servant of the Nation, it was
*khudai khidmatgar*--God's servant. Let it now proclaim to
itself and the world that it is only God's servant-nothing
more, nothing less. If it engages in the ungainly skirmish for
power, it will find one fine morning that it is no more. Thank
God, it is now no longer in sole possession of the field.
I have only opened to view the distant scene. If I have the
time and health, I hope to discuss in these columns what the
servants of the Nation can do to raise themselves in the
estimation of their masters, the whole of the adult population,
male and female.
New Delhi, 27-1-'48
M, K. Gandhi